UC Santa Barbara > History Department > Prof. Marcuse > Courses > Hist 133d Homepage > Hist 133bd Book Essays Index page > Student essay

Kogon, book cover
cover of the 2006 edition

"Surviving a Day that Feels Like a Year"

Book Essay on:
Eugen Kogon, The Theory and Practice of Hell:
German Concentration Camps and the System Behind Them

(New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006 ed. [1946]), 307 pages. UCSB: Main Library DD256.5 .K614

by Christina Hawkins
March 19, 2008

for Prof. Marcuse's lecture course
The Holocaust in German History
UC Santa Barbara, Winter 2008



About the Author
& Abstract
Essay
Bibliography
and Links
Plagiarism Warning
$10 & searchable
at amazon

About Christina Hawkins

I am senior sociology major with an exercise and health science minor. I have always had a strong interest in expanding my knowledge about the Holocaust; I find it to be a very interesting subject matter with never ending questions. I chose to write about Kogon’s book because I am interested in knowing what life inside the camps was really like beyond the surface level of what I am already aware of. In short I want to better understand the experience individuals went through by reading their story as they witnessed it.

Abstract (back to top)

Eugen Kogon, while a prisoner in the German concentration camps, also served as a medical assistant for many years until the war ended. However, before becoming a prisoner he studied sociology at the Universities of Munich, Florence, and Vienna, thereby further validating his observations and ideas while in the concentration camps. Kogon, manages to comprise a classic account of life and death within concentration camps. Through this work, The Theory and Practice of Hell, Kogon shows what life inside the camps is like from a critical perspective using honest details. Many personal accounts have been written over the years, but yet fail to explain the true practices of the SS. Kogon’s account shows not individual stories, but rather a picture of the system as a whole. The events of the Holocaust are due to the fact collaboration was in part one way to survive, evil people were involved, and some people were blinded by the Nazi ideology. These atrocities happened because of the systematic and psychological elements that made the existence and operation of the concentration camps become a reality.


Essay (back to top)

Introduction:

Today the Holocaust is one of the best known genocides in history. However, people are unsure of why this mass murdering ever happened. Hitler came into power in 1933; it is then that he and other Nazis had strong ideas on what they viewed as a racially pure community of the people. Immediately they took action against those who they wanted to isolate, deport, or destroy. A German political prisoner who was an inmate from 1939 until liberation in 1945, Eugen Kogon, manages to comprise a classic account of life and death within concentration camps. Through this work, The Theory and Practice of Hell, Kogon shows what life inside the camps is like from a critical perspective using honest details. Ultimately though, how is it that awful things happen to such innocent people? Often society is in denial of the horrendous torture that individuals faced throughout their time within camps.

The truth is these horrible events happened to millions of people, but why, is the better question. The events of the Holocaust are due to the fact collaboration was in part one way to survive, evil people were involved, and some people were blinded by the Nazi ideology. These atrocities happened because of the systematic and psychological elements that made the existence and operation of the concentration camps become a reality. These atrocities were accomplished systematically through the precise division of labor. Psychologically the pressures individuals were under, both as inmates and the SS, caused people to act out in ways that are unimaginable.

Unlike many accounts that show the Holocaust as an unorganized slaughter, this account shows the ways in which a systematic routine tortured and killed six million innocent human beings. After reading this book, a strong sense of realism reveals the depths to which individuals stoop when all restraints are detached. The reality shown by Kogon is that Nazi concentration camps were based upon forced labor under atrocious conditions. “Some of the work in camp was useful, but some of it was utterly senseless, intended only as a form of torture, a diversion engaged in by the SS for fun,” proving that the Nazis were simply acting inhumanly (86). At the same time it is hard for someone in a normal state of mind to begin to dream up these cruel acts.

Eugen Kogon:

Eugen Kogon, while a prisoner in the German concentration camps, also served as a medical assistant for many years until the war ended. However, before becoming a prisoner he studied sociology at the Universities of Munich, Florence, and Vienna, thereby further validating his observations and ideas while in the concentration camps. Sociology is a science that attempts the interpretative understanding of social action in order to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects, according to sociologist Max Weber. Therefore, one could better understand how Kogon may have been able to report back on the overall events that took place while in camp life. Many personal accounts have been written over the years, but yet fail to explain the true practices of the SS. Kogon’s account shows not individual stories, but rather a picture of the system as a whole. In Kogon’s eyes, “ The truth alone can set us free” (13).

The Camp System:

Initially concentration camps were established to imprison Communists, Socialists, asocials, or others who did not fit into the national community according to Nazi standards. The primary goal of the Nazis was to “teach” these Germans what they needed to know to return to society. According to Nazi ideology Jews could never belong to the national community, so that political and social “reeducation” was a mere waste. Therefore, it became the task of the SS to train the new ruling class while eliminating all opposition.

There were numerous aims which the institutions of the concentration camps were to serve. First, the camps served as the training ground where the SS Death's-Head units were trained to brutalize. The training was meant to get these people to act without feelings against the inferior race. Second, the concentration camps were for the collection and exploitation of SS labor slaves. It was said that, “So long as these slaves were permitted to live at all, they lived only to serve their masters” (32). It was always about getting the most out of individuals before they were gone; therefore, if that meant grueling work for a slave then so be it. Third, the camps were used for large-scale scientific experimentation claiming to benefit mankind. The thought process behind this was that if a person was already doomed to death; why not gain some experimental knowledge beforehand. The SS received complete satisfaction with the steady increase in numbers. Their main mission had become a reality, “Resistance to the regime by disaffected elements grew feebler and feebler” (32).

The concentration camps were planned out in great detail as to how people entering them would be displaced. Classification of the camps was designed to get the most “dangerous” exterminated as quickly as possible. The Main Economic and Administrative Office designated three progressive classes of concentration camps.

Class I (labor camps) represented the mildest form. Class II meant that living and working conditions were more rigorous. Class III stood for the “mills of death” which the prisoners seldom left alive. The Gestapo never fully achieved its goal--to place all criminals, homosexuals, Jews and political prisoners deemed especially dangerous in Class III camps. (35)

This set up shows that the Nazis were well aware of the types of people they felt to be superior to as well as the ones they wanted to get rid of. However, Kogon states that these classifications were merely an ideal compared to the true picture. For example Dachau was always a Class I camp, where by those who actually experienced life there would be baffled by this statement. Therefore, where the Nazis actually had a plan in tact; however, the follow through of it may not be accurate.

Even the physical set-up of the concentration camps was well thought out. The SS consistently chose inaccessible areas to place the various camps. Camps were to be placed in forests and moors, not too far away from the larger cities; this in itself served various purposes. “The camps were to remain isolated from the outside world, while the SS itself was to retain access to urban amenities” (48). This allowed for the Nazis to supply the camps with the necessary amenities while keeping the rest of the populace in a state of unknown. The Nazis were carrying out their individual plans of extermination while keeping the rest of society in constant fear. Again this was the Nazis’ way of proving to the people they were in charge based on their superiority.

Psychology:

Seen from the outside, the reactions of the prisoners are far more comprehensible than those of their oppressors. The prisoners are nothing more than human beings, responding to horrific acts in ways that you would expect, much like a fight or flight response. However, the character of the SS is something much too inhumane to comprehend. The men involved with Hitler’s elite guards were of a nature that held a very primitive psychological mechanism. These men “suffered from no internal conflicts between instinct and reason” (258). The only limits were in the form of the actuality of their instincts and the correspondence to the prescribed SS goals. There was no concern for the schematics of it all just as long as the prisoners did the “work,” which was often accomplished by any means possible. In the minds of the SS it was logical to compensate for their sense of failure with arrogance, which they used to show they were better than the prisoners. By wearing down the prisoners they were ultimately trying to “outsmart” them in order to be at the top of the hierarchy. However, there were some individuals who “were quite simply attracted to the SS ideology as the mode of life that appealed to them and agreed to them” (260). In this sense they were so blinded by the Nazi ideology that they thought that these concepts were actually good.

Functional knowledge of the SS was very low, in fact they held the capacity of an eighth-grader most of the time, showing that they were not very bright. The only interest these men showed in gaining further knowledge was in the field of military, and this was only to enhance their own superiority. All that was needed “was conscious awareness of being the master class, of being an elite even within the Nazi party” (267). It was always about staying within the realm of SS desires and aspirations. The SS reached the psychological point that shooting down a prisoner was nothing to them carrying out orders. In addition, they earned a bonus for any mental and other discomforts the prisoner may have gone through. What society saw during the Holocaust was not “baffling mysteries of human nature, but violations of simple, basic, psychological laws in the evolution of inferior mind” (271). Basically what it came down to was inferiority that led these men into the SS, where they found refuge in the opportunity to assert their superiority. “The behavior of each individual SS member, whatever his rank, typified the system and its basic orientation” (271). This psychological mindset that against the norms of society in which one knows basic right from wrong. One can truly say that the men who performed these horrendous acts were not of the same nature as the prisoners.

As for the prisoners, it was hard for anyone to go out the same way they came in. Psychologically it was not possible for a human to experience such extreme conditions and not be affected in the way so many were. People were suffering tortures that most people cannot even begin to dream up, and yet these prisoners dealt with “psychological patterns that almost defy classification,” so that these people were going through an out of body experience (273). Mental types were formed by way of the process of adaptation to the new environment in order to survive. Living became a mind game for those stuck inside; how was one to deal with seeing their loved ones shot in front of them or forced to strip naked and be humiliated? It was the immediate effects of these acts of compulsion that ultimately determined the fate of a prisoner. At that moment a man would have already gone into an almost irresistible mental decline, or he would have begun to adapt himself to the concentration camp life.

Ultimately collaboration was one way to survive the concentration camps. Every prisoner was dependent on his fellow prisoners. Impulses that came upon them internally were based upon selfishness and common sense, often this was sharpened by feelings of aversion. A common camp saying was, “The prisoner’s worst enemy is the prisoner!” (279). This meant that at times it may not be what is best for the group but rather the individual that was at stake. However, “There were really but three forms of making an adjustment: to remain a lone wolf; to join a group; or to appear in the guise of a political partisan” (279). Each of the above came with positive and negative aspects, but depending on the individual it might work out to their benefit to fall into one of the three. Men who stayed alone were often of high integrity that had exceptional judgment. Many of these men were disliked by their fellow inmates, but at the same time lone wolves were more exposed to danger due to their isolation. Group allegiance gave some prisoners the sense of humanity back into their lives. It was said to be the finest experience during the concentration camps. Finally, political partisanship offered ulterior purposes within the camps. For every man on the left who found help and support, they were able to better adapt to camp life while making it much easier. However, very few of the men were ever able to escape the psychological mechanism that was so overpowering during their time within the camps.

Opposition:

Contrary to the evidence above, there are also accounts of people or systems failing to comply with the overall normal routines of camp life. For instance the organization of individual camps was not always paid attention to. “The Gestapo did not pay the least attention to whether the concentration-camp system of the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office was able to cope with the masses of prisoners often dumped on the gatehouses without notice,” revealing contradictions in the division of labor that were supposed to be coordinated at all levels (270). At the same time the Gestapo did not care if there was space, clothing, food, or medicines. It was always about operating systems by oneself as well as moving up in the ranks. Therefore, any way to exploit the system of labor was seen as a sense of superiority. Also where every prisoner was said to be dependent on one another, there were cases of individuals sticking up for themselves; “There were, however, outstanding examples of solidarity to the death, of the unfaltering assumption of responsibility for the whole group down to the last” (278). By an individual not offering resistance upon a death sentence, it was his way of going out as an individual rather than being a part of a larger group.

Conclusion:

Kogon was one of the first people to attempt to explain the life within concentration camps and put it into perspective for society at large. However, the truth is, one cannot fathom these events nor relive them. The stories told throughout this book are ones that the human mind cannot even begin to picture. In the end, one can clearly note this genocide to be one that was systematically planned through a well organized division of labor. Some may still argue that this event was simply a mass murder of millions of innocent people, but the evidence proves otherwise. Kogon’s chilling account only begins to highlight the atrocities that were performed in camp life. However, it is the truth and this account is the beginning of setting those who experienced this mayhem free, as Kogon wrote (13).


Bibliography and Links (back to top)(links last checked 3/23/08)

Book Review:

  • Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Editorial Note From the Publisher (link)
    “By the spring of 1945, the Second World War was drawing to a close in Europe. Allied troops were sweeping through Nazi Germany and discovering the atrocities of SS concentration camps. The first to be reached intact was Buchenwald, in central Germany. American soldiers struggled to make sense of the shocking scenes they witnessed inside. They asked a small group of former inmates to draft a report on the camp. It was led by Eugen Kogon, a German political prisoner who had been an inmate since 1939. The Theory and Practice of Hell is his classic account of life inside. Unlike many other books by survivors who published immediately after the war, The Theory and Practice of Hell is more than a personal account. It is a horrific examination of life and death inside a Nazi concentration camp, a brutal world of a state within state, and a society without law. But Kogon maintains a dispassionate and critical perspective. He tries to understand how the camp works, to uncover its structure and social organization. He knew that the book would shock some readers and provide others with gruesome fascination. But he firmly believed that he had to show the camp in honest, unflinching detail. The result is a unique historical document—a complete picture of the society, morality, and politics that fueled the systematic torture of six million human beings. For many years, The Theory and Practice of Hell remained the seminal work on the concentration camps, particularly in Germany. Reissued with an introduction by Nikolaus Waschmann, a leading Holocaust scholar and author of Hilter's Prisons, this important work now demands to be re-read.”

Books:

  • Berenbaum , Michael, and Yisrael Gutman. Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998. UCSB: Main Library D805.P7 A53 1994 
    This book discusses the history of the Auschwitz death camp in regards to the technology and magnitude of the Holocaust overall. Even though this book is rather lengthy at 640 pages it is a great resource for answering a wide range of questions about the camp experience. It covers a wide array of topics that Kogon attempts in answering about camp life.
  • Kogon, Eugen, Hermann Langbein, and Adalbert Ruckerl. Nazi Mass Murder: A Documentary History of the Use of Poison Gas. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993. UCSB: Main Library D804.G4 N2913 1993
    This is another one of Kogon’s collaborations discussing various topics about the Holocaust. Some of these include the dynamics of camp life, and the testimonies of those who were involved with the mass killings.
  • Sereny, Gitta. Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 1983. UCSB: Main Library D805.G3 S456 1983
    This book discusses the justifications that many SS men tried to process as to why they would commit such inhumane acts on innocent people. Sereny interviews Stangl, who was the Kommandant of Treblinka in trying to discover what exactly was the psychological rational behind the murders. Just as Sereny tried to understand, Kogon’s book discusses the psychological effects of both the prisoners as well as the SS.

Websites:

  • Brugioni, Dino, and Robert Poirer. "The Holocaust Revisited: A Retrospective Analysis of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Extermination Complex." Global Security. 26 April 2005.<http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/imint/holocaust.htm>
    The authors of this site explore the various artifacts left over from what the camp set up was like during the Holocaust. Some of the camps have been preserved into memorials where others such as Treblinka have been completely demolished. The various photographs of the camp sites allow for a better understand of how horrible the conditions really were.
  • The Simon Wiesenthal Center . “Museum of Tolerance Multimedia Learning Center.” 1999. 17 Mar 2008. http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=358201
    This site offers great information on a variety of topics included in Kogon’s book. It allows you to see frequently asked questions in which are answered as well. I found this site exciting to explore in discovering new information about the Holocaust. There are collections of Kogon’s work which further explore other works he has done.
  • United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “The Camp System.” 17 Mar 2008. http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/ncamp.htm
    This is a great site to explore in searching for the full history of the Holocaust. At the same time it has an extensive section on the camp system in which Kogon discusses in his book.
  • German Wikipedia, “Eugen Kogon,” 17 Mar 2008.
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Kogon
    This page offers a very basic background about Eugen Kogon as well as the works he has published over the years. It gives includes links to his other works including various articles that have been written on him too. This site is a good starting place for bibliographic information on Kogon.
  • Hist 133d review of Kogon by Victor Fernandez-Murillo
  • Hist 133d review of Kogon by Rachel Peña


(back to top)

Any student tempted to use this paper for an assignment in another course or school should be aware of the serious consequences for plagiarism. Here is what I write in my syllabi:

Plagiarism—presenting someone else's work as your own, or deliberately failing to credit or attribute the work of others on whom you draw (including materials found on the web)—is a serious academic offense, punishable by dismissal from the university. It hurts the one who commits it most of all, by cheating them out of an education. I report offenses to the Office of the Dean of Students for disciplinary action.


prepared for web by Harold Marcuse on 3/19/08; last updated:
back to top, to Hist 133d homepage, 133b+d Book Essays index page; Prof. Marcuse's Courses page; Professor's homepage